Home » Current Affairs » Universities as massive Western, globalist propaganda tools – Hanne Herland in leading, American conservative World Net Daily – Herland Report
Universities as massive Western, globalist propaganda tools – Hanne Herland in leading, American conservative World Net Daily – Herland Report

Universities as massive Western, globalist propaganda tools – Hanne Herland in leading, American conservative World Net Daily – Herland Report

Share the article

These days universities seem to be the main halls of biased, politically correct propaganda. This is where students learn not to think freely. It is where the young are taught how to become obedient to the illiberal, mainstream elites who chronically work to destroy free thinking in the West, writes Hanne Herland in her weekly column at the leading American conservative outlet, WND.

Debates are no longer free and open; rather, the university campus is an arena of a strict authoritarian push against free speech and the respect for diverse opinions.

Millions watch Herland Report TV. Subscribe:

About The Author

Hanne Nabintu Herland is a bestselling historian of religions and author, founder and host of The Herland Report, known from the media for fearless speech and stern criticism of political correctness.
She states that our democracies have been taken over by an extreme-liberal elite that no longer listens to the voice of the people. Her new book, The Culture War. How the West lost its Greatness, is available all over the USA and in 60 countries world wide. www.theherlandreport.com

Hanne Herland with leading intellectual and free-thinker, Milo Yiannopoulos. Click on the picture and watch one of the Herland TV (HTV) shows with Milo.

Based on the professor’s ideological lens, he teaches classes and effectively colors the mind of the young. And it is no news that research often relies on purely subjective assumptions.

Historian and philosopher of science Thomas S. Kuhn garnered attention in the 1960s when he showed how subjective much of the research at universities really is. The dominant worldview strongly influences the opinions of professors and students alike.

The individual scientist is often much more influenced by the ideologies of his time and subjected to a peer pressure to reach the conclusions he knows will be applauded. He tends to end up interpreting his subject matter in line with the trends.

In “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” Kuhn explains that in science, the dominant understanding of reality builds on a series of assumptions. It becomes the intellectual’s role to produce evidence that supports the dominant academic consensus, which Kuhn calls the dominant paradigm.

A paradigm, the theoretical framework of a scientific school – the popular way to view the world – may work wonderfully and enable scientists to provide a basis for the scientist to map the pieces of his findings into a system of understanding. Yet, if paradigms are inadequate, they end up making wrong assumptions, and its conclusions, in turn, fail. They come to the wrong conclusions.

Kuhn points out that the role of the oppositional intellectual is to challenge the ruling paradigm and break the logjam of politically correct assumptions. If no one dares break out of the deadlock, and nobody poses critical questions in order to examine the current hypothesis’, the quality of intellectual thinking is steadily reduced. The end result is a totalitarian system in which the professor’s job is no longer to examine the evidence, but to present arguments that support the ideas of the current elites.

Indeed, others before Kuhn had studied the problem of twisting history in order to make it better fit the ruling paradigms.

In the 1600s, Francis Bacon complained in “Novum Organum” of the medieval scientist, that he did not sufficiently incorporate a sufficient range of experience in framing his decisions. The scientist first determined the question and then sought for the answers he wished for, Bacon said, those answers that fit his assumptions, to begin with. He stated that a scientist’s method too often ended up bending the evidence to suit his own ideology or preference.

It is, for instance, a historical fact that the Early Middle Ages was a time when monasteries were the leading intellectual learning sites, educating the elite and providing for the poor and needy. Yet, modern-day professors have often referred to this age as “The Dark Ages.”

It is true that the term also refers to the period after the fall of the Roman Empire onward, yet many regularly use the term when referring to the Early Middle Ages, negatively focusing on the religious worldview at the time. On the other hand, the 1600s is described as the “Age of Enlightenment,” implying that as scientists were questioning God, increasingly critical of traditional religion, looking for other explanations of nature, that would somehow make them more “enlightened” than the previous generations.

There seems to be an underlying need, a hidden agenda, to insinuate that an age of strong religious beliefs automatically was “a dark phase” in European history. Yet, it was the early Christian medieval thinkers who first enhanced rationality on a large scale, placing the ability to reason on the same level as faith, stating that both of these qualities lead to knowledge. The scholastics during the Middle Ages studied nature and the cosmos in order to understand God better, and strongly emphasized the need for rationality. They laid the foundation for the later study of modern science and order in nature.

Professors and intellectuals who should defend fearless speech instead become puppets of an academic elite, rather than being critical voices, posing questions to those in power. If critical voices are silenced and open discussions cease, scientific research itself glides into an apathetic self-confirming state. This becomes, as Harvard professor Harvey Mansfield puts it, a subtle form of tyranny, a soft despotism.

Follow my column at World Net Daily. 




Every Friday you will receive a newsletter with the relevant articles that we have published during the week.

Fill in your email adress and press the button above!

Share the article


  1. Recently it was announced in our regional Newspaper on Long Island, NY that some group wants to remove the children’s Christmas song, “Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer” from being aired on radio as it promotes bullying (towards Rudolph). Parents of this group do not want their precious children to be exposed to such realities in life.

    Yet the song demonstrates that Rudolph actually defeated his reindeer bullies through perseverance to lead the Santa’s sleigh.

    This is what we have been reduced to by Leftists in the US who think that by eliminating any form of confrontation possible their children could encounter, their children will mature into stronger adults emotionally. However, just the opposite is occurring where these protected children can no longer think for themselves independently or deal with problem situations that they will encounter in real life once they are beyond the parents’ abilities to protect them.

    I am a completely independent thinker and do not associate myself with either the Left or the Right. However, admittedly, though I support fairness, honesty and equality for all, I tend to fall more on the Conservative side of things as varying forms of social engineering has never been shown to produce anything but dysfunctional aspects in societies…

  2. Well–Jordon Peterson and his cohort Ezra Levant–complain that the leading issue in today’s universities is the conundrum of antisemitism. Certainly the current paradigm [supported by countless laws and dictates] prevents anyone from criticizing anything that is done in the name of Judaism/Zionism. It is indeed the most forbidden topic on the face of the planet. So I am encouraged that our youth are addressing what is the most fundamental issue of today–the role of the jew in a predominately gentile world–and this tiny tribe’s inordinate influence on world politics– dating back to pre-Biblical Egyptians.

    Read well-known author Texe Marrs, “Holy Serpent of the Jews” –perhaps the survival instincts of our youth are over-riding the the restrictions on critical thought and free speech: Rage, rage before the dying of the light!

  3. I have learned a few things today: That in the Middle Ages the poor were provided for! That faith is just as good as reason as a path to knowledge. And that not questioning religious beliefs is critical thinking. Who knows, flat-earthers might be onto something, after all!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com