New York Times

New York Times articles go to Government for Approval pre Publishing

The New York Times has publicly acknowledged that it sends some of its stories to the US government for approval from “national security officials” before publication. New York Times articles go to Government for Approval.

This confirms what veteran New York Times correspondents like James Risen have said: The American newspaper of record regularly collaborates with the US government, suppressing reporting that top officials don’t want made public, writes Ben Norton at Grayzone.

 

Millions watch Herland Report TV. Subscribe:

Aldous Huxley quote
New York Times articles go to Government for Approval prior to Publishing.

On June 15, the Times reported that the US government is escalating its cyber attacks on Russia’s power grid. According to the article, “the Trump administration is using new authorities to deploy cybertools more aggressively,” as part of a larger “digital Cold War between Washington and Moscow.”

In response to the report, Donald Trump attacked the Times on Twitter, calling the article “a virtual act of Treason.”

The New York Times PR office replied to Trump from its official Twitter account, defending the story and noting that it had, in fact, been cleared with the US government before being printed.

“Accusing the press of treason is dangerous,” the Times communications team said. “We described the article to the government before publication.”

“As our story notes, President Trump’s own national security officials said there were no concerns,” the Times added.

New York Times

Indeed, the Times report on the escalating American cyber attacks against Russia is attributed to “current and former [US] government officials.”

The neoliberal self-declared “Resistance” jumped on Trump’s reckless accusation of treason (the Democratic Coalition, which boasts, “We help run #TheResistance,” responded by calling Trump “Putin’s puppet”). The rest of the corporate media went wild.

But what was entirely overlooked was the most revealing thing in the New York Times’ statement: The newspaper of record was essentially admitting that it has a symbiotic relationship with the US government.

In fact, some prominent American pundits have gone so far as to insist that this symbiotic relationship is precisely what makes someone a journalist.

In May, neoconservative Washington Post columnist Marc Thiessen — a former speechwriter for President George W. Bush — declared that WikiLeaks publisher and political prisoner Julian Assange is “not a journalist”; rather, he is a “spy” who “deserves prison.” (Thiessen also once called Assange “the devil.”)

What was the Post columnist’s rationale for revoking Assange’s journalistic credentials? Unlike “reputable news organizations, Assange did not give the U.S. government an opportunity to review the classified information WikiLeaks was planning to release so they could raise national security objections,” Thiessen wrote. “So responsible journalists have nothing to fear.”

In other words, this former US government speechwriter turned corporate media pundit insists that collaborating with the government, and censoring your reporting to protect so-called “national security,” is definitionally what makes you a journalist. This is the express ideology of the American commentariat.

THOUSANDS SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER AND TV SHOWS. Follow the trend and be one of them and SHARE the articles:
Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see what we publish is to subscribe to the mailing list, which will get you a weekly email notification and alerts about our TV shows. Our articles and TV shows are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around.
Bestselling author, Hanne Herland new book New Left Tyranny

Check Also

Who is behind the US Drug Epidemic? Chris Farell, Judicial Watch, Herland Report.

Herland Report TV: Who is behind the US Drug Epidemic? Chris Farrell, Judicial Watch

  The Herland Report TV: Who is behind the US Drug Epidemic? Historian Hanne Herland …

Nancy Pelosi ice cream talk demonstrates Democrat elite perspective: Herland Report

Nancy Pelosi ice cream talk shows Democrat elite perspective while millions suffer

  Herland Report: Nancy Pelosi ice cream talk demonstrates Democrat elite perspective: The “Late Late …

EU law requires cookies. By continuing to use this site, you agree to this. more information

EU law requires cookies for the best browsing experience. If you continue to use this website or click "Accept", you are consenting.

Close